Compare and contrast how some psychological phenomenon was written about in some “pop psychology” source to how it was written about in the original scientific research article that inspired the pop psych source. “Pop psychology” refers to non peer-reviewed summaries of scientific research, such as undergraduate textbooks, news articles, books, movies, TV shows, podcasts, or Tiktoks (probs). Was there any important information that was lost between the original research article (which you should look up and read) and the way the research was reported for a broader audience? Did the news article or original research article make any claims that you don’t think are warranted?