NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct
To prepare:
• Critically analyze this week’s Learning Resources.
Post a 2- to 3-paragraph evaluation of the relationship between the research question and secondary data. Include the following:
• Your position on whether it is more important to devise your research question first and then match it with the appropriate secondary data, or to develop your research question after reviewing secondary data
• A description of one strength and one limitation to each approach (justify your responses)
Support your post with the Learning Resources and current literature. Use APA formatting for your Discussion and to cite your resources.
Support your response with additional scholarly resources. Use APA formatting for your Discussion and to cite your resources.
Resources
Fullerton, S. M., & Lee, S. S.-J. (2011). Secondary uses and the governance of de-identified data: lessons from the human genome diversity panel. BMC Medical Ethics, 12, 16.
