Women Suffrage Movement

HIS 200 Writing Plan Progress Check 3 Guidelines and Rubric

Overview: Throughout Modules Three and Four, you have continued to work on your Project 1: Writing Plan assignment, which you will formally submit for
completion at the end of Module Four of the course. This progress check assignment provides you with an important opportunity to get valuable instructor
feedback on the progress you are making and to ensure you are on the right track for your later submission.

Prompt: Module Three: Communicating Historical Ideas has considered how historians communicate their message to a specific audience. Return to your
submission for Progress Check 2 and identify an audience that would be interested in your event and research question and describe how and why you would
tailor your message to that audience. You will also describe primary and secondary sources you could use to research your historical event.

Specifically, in this assignment, you will submit the following elements of your Project 1: Writing Plan for review by your instructor:

In Module Three: Communicating Historical Ideas, Learning Block 3-4 (page 2) in the webtext, you completed the following element:

I.
Describe the historical event that you selected. Why is this event significant?
II.
Describe at least two secondary sources that you could use to research your historical event. Your sources must be relevant to your event and must be of an appropriate academic nature. In your description, consider questions such as: What are the similarities and differences in the content of your
sources? What makes them appropriate and relevant for investigating your event? What was your thought process when you were searching for
sources? How did you make choices?

III.
Describe at least two primary sources that you could use to research your historical event. Your sources must be relevant to your event and must be of an appropriate academic nature. In your description, consider questions such as: How do these sources relate to your secondary sources? What do they add to your understanding of the event? What makes them appropriate and relevant for investigating your event?
In Module Three: Communicating Historical Ideas, Learning Block 3-4 (page 3) in the webtext, you worked toward the following element:

IV.
Based on your review of primary and secondary sources, develop a research question related to the historical event you selected. In other words, what
would you like to know more about?

Create a thesis statement based on your research question. This will help you address these two critical elements later on:

V.
Identify an audience that would be interested in your historical event and research question. For example, who would benefit most from hearing your
message?

VI.
Describe how and why you can tailor your message to your audience, providing specific examples. For example, will your audience understand historical
terminology and principles associated with your event, or will you need to explain these? How will you communicate effectively with your audience?

Please note that the numbering included above directly aligns with the numbering of these elements as they are presented in the Project 1 Guidelines and
Rubric. You will need to add finishing touches to this progress check submission to prepare your final writing plan for submission in Module Four.

Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: The Writing Plan Progress Check 3 must be submitted as a 1page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12point Times
New Roman font, and oneinch margins. Follow the formatting of the example included in Module Three: Communicating Historical Ideas, learning block 34
(page 3) in the webtext and include identifying information (name, course code and title, assignment title, name of university, and date) as well as section
headings (preliminary writing plan, sources, thesis statement) as appropriate.

Critical Elements
Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Historical Event
Describes selected historical event
and its significance

Describes selected historical event
and its significance, but with gaps
in detail or clarity

Does not describe selected
historical event and its
significance

5

Secondary Sources
Describes at least two relevant and appropriate secondary
sources that could be used to research the historical event

Describes at least two secondary sources that could be used to
research the historical event, but with gaps in appropriateness,
relevance, or detail
Does not describe at least two secondary sources that could be
used to research the historical event
20
Primary Sources
Describes at least two relevant and appropriate primary sources
that could be used to research the historical event
Describes at least two primary sources that could be used toresearch the historical event, but with gaps in appropriateness,
relevance, or detail
Does not describe at least two primary sources that could be
used to research the historical event
20
Research Question Develops research question related to the selected historical
event based on review of primary and secondary sources

Develops research question related to the selected historical
event, but question is not based on review of primary and
secondary sources
Does not develop research
question related to the selected historical event
20
Thesis
Meets criteria for Proficient and
supports thesis with evidence
from sources

Develops a thesis statement
related to the research question

Does not develop a thesis
statement

25

Articulation of Response
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability
and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
10


    Customer Area

    Make your order right away

    Confidentiality and privacy guaranteed

    satisfaction guaranteed