Pollinator Gardens
1. Title (In Map and Outline): eye-catching and informative title that is specific and characterizes the central theme of creating pollinator gardens in the city park of Pittsburgh.
2. Introduction & Motivation:Set the stage for the questions you are asking and give an overview of why you are doing this research. Describe the context of your project ( observations that led you to the project or other information) and present a general descriiption of your project location.
3. Problem Statement (geographic questions & goals): state the specific geographic and spatial questions you answer for the project.
4. Methods: Describe specifically what you did to accomplish the goals of the project. List software (used ArcGIS- ArcCatalog/ArcMap), the projection you placed your project in, steps in your analysis describing GIS tools (ex: clip, dissolve, geocode, union, model builder), and describe inputs and outputs of the tools that you used, and other relevant information. You should have a geodatabase dedicated to your project. DO not list data sources or download efforts.
5. Results: Show what your results are by using your map and summarize with text, charts, and graphs. Do NOT explain or interpret anything here. Show what happened in a way that can be read easily. Be sure to refer your reader to your map, for example, “Figure 1 shows…” If needed, place in table.
6. MAP ELEMENTS: – title – give your figure a number to reference in your report. Ex: Figure 1- runoff volume in Pine Creek – Cartographer Name & date of publication – Data source, EX: United States Geological Survey – North Arrow – Scale Bar – Legend – Coordinate System – Use of reference (EX: transportation, insert of location map, boundaries, and cities) – Colors are chosen appropriate to communicate the problem depicted by the map – Font and text contributed to the dissemination of information and were easily readable – Layout of essential map elements utilized white space well – Map represents data to reflect the topic and problem statement accurately – Map is professional in appearance
7, Discussion: What do your results say about the original questions? How confident are you in your findings? What are some possible explanations for results that didn’t come out as expected? Were there any surprises?
8. Implications, conclusions, and possible future work: what implications do these findings have for your objectives? What new questions do they raise? What could be tried next?
